การประเมินผล Evaluation

มีสามส่วนที่จะได้รับการประเมินเพื่อให้ได้ผลการประเมินโดยรวมของงาน:
โครงการกลุ่ม
การนำเสนอ
กลุ่มฟอรัมสนทนา

 1. Evaluation of the group project  

  

Beginning 

1 

 

Developing

 2 

 

Accomplished

 3 

 

Exemplary

 4 

 

Score 

(100%)

 

 

 Content

(40%)

Does not follow the instructions, just copying all the information and demonstrate unclear thinking. 

Follow few instructions but  copy all the information with no filting and demonstrate unclear thinking

Follow most of the instructions and show high order thinking

Follow all the instructions. All the information had been selected . Show high order thinking

 

 

 

Information Gathering

(30%) 

All the information are irrelevant and lack of information

Most of the information are irrelevant and lack of information

Most of the information are irrelevant and plenty of information

Contributive, releveant and plenty of information

 

 

 

Formatting

(20%)

Wrong arrangement and absent of elements required

Some of the arrangement are wrong and some of the required elements are present

Arrangement is followed by instructionswith some elements are missing

Arrangement is followed by instructions and present of all required elements

 

 

 

Grammer and spelling

(10%)

Errors in proofreading, grammar, syntax, punctuation or spelling which prevents the reader from understanding the meaning

Most of the proofreading, grammar, syntax, punctuation and spelling are correct but reader find hard to understand the meaning

Most of the proofreading, grammar, syntax, punctuation and spelling are correct and reader can understand the meaning easily

No Errors in proofreading, grammar, syntax, punctuation or spelling which prevents the reader from understanding the meaning

 

 

 

 

2. Evaluation of the group presentation 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning  

1 

Developing 

 2 

Accomplished 

 3 

Exemplary 

 4 

Score (100%)

Content

(40%)

Subject knowledge is weak. The content is confusing, missing and wrong.

 Make audience a confused understanding

 

Subject is fair. Part of content is confusing, missing or wrong but make audience a fair understanding.

Subject is good. The content is correct with no missing content but some content also make audiences mis-understand

Subject is excellent. All the contents are correct and clear. Never make audiences a confused understanding. 

 

 

 

Design

(30%)

Both the text and colour are confusing and cluttered.

 No graphics, video, audio, chart or other enhancements are enrich and clarity the content 

 

The text and colour are clear with some graphics, video, audio, chart but most os all enhancements.are are not reinforce message. Just random use of graphical elements. 

Clear looking of text and colour of the slides but Most of the multimedia enhancements are reinforce message. 

Clear looking of text and colour of the slides with reasonable and suitable multimedia elements added

 

 

 

Organization

(20%)

 

 

Poor arrangement of PowerPoint content and Presentation are either too long or too short. 

Poor arrangement of PowerPoint content but Good time management of the presentation 

Suitable arrangement of the PowerPoint content but Presentation overruns 

Suitable arrangement of the PowerPoint content and Good time management of the presentation

 

 

 

Oral

(10%)

 

 

Speaking Isn’t fluent, incorrect pronounciation with no eye contact and make audiences confused during the presenatation

Speaking are fair fluent and acceptable pronounciation with eye contact but sometimes make audiences mis-understanding during the presenatation

Speaking are good and fluent. with eye contact. The pronounciation is acceptable . And most of audiences can understand during the presenatation 

Fluent speaking, correct pronounciation, enough eye contact and audiences can understand easily during the presenatation

 

 

 

 

3. Evaluation of the Discussion Forum  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning 

1 

 

Developing

 2 

 

Accomplished

 3 

 

Exemplary

 4 

 

Score (100%)

Conrtibution in the Forum

(50%)

 

Rarely contribute to the Forum and reject to reply the lecturer’s question.

Sometimes contribute to the Forum and reply the lecturer’s question.

Usually contribute to the Forum and discuss with the lecturer.

Always contribute to the Forum and discuss with lecturer and classmates

 

Participation in the Forum Discussion

(50%)

 

Rarely give respond in the forum

Sometimes respond the lecturer’s questions in the forum.

Usually respond the lecturer’s questions and discuss with the lecturer in the forum

Always respond to the forum and discuss with the lecturer and classmates